In Union County, South Carolina, the formerly prosperous cotton mills that once employed numerous residents have vanished. Today, the county is labeled a “food desert,” indicating that a significant portion of its inhabitants reside at a distance from the closest supermarket. Addressing this challenge, community non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated efforts in 2016, working alongside farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the county, where roughly 30% of the citizens are Black and nearly 25% experience poverty.
At first, Ms. Ashby financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. But in 2023, her work gained substantial support as the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of one of the country’s largest companies—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was included in a larger $1.5 million initiative designed to assist “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“I was moved to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates what you do.”
Just two years ago, programs like this were widely backed by major corporations across the U.S., as the country reckoned with systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who died under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
Nonetheless, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these pledges. In November, Walmart revealed the cessation of certain diversity programs, which includes the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, a key player in funding the grant received by Ms. Ashby.
Companies such as Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have all made similar moves, reflecting a broader corporate pullback from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
This transition signifies a significant cultural shift, partly fueled by concerns over potential legal issues, regulatory examination, and negative reactions on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has aggressively worked to dismantle DEI programs, advocating for a return to “merit-based opportunity” in America. He has ordered the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and launch investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of engaging in “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put nearly 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump ousted the nation’s top military general—a Black individual—after the defense secretary had earlier recommended his removal because of his connection to “woke” DEI strategies.
At first glance, it might appear that the U.S. has given up on improving outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. Yet, some experts propose that these programs may continue, though perhaps rebranded to match the evolving political environment of a country that has recently chosen a leader focused on contesting “woke” policies.
The Origins of the Backlash
Programs resembling DEI first gained traction in the U.S. during the 1960s as a response to the civil rights movement, which aimed to broaden and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described with terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives were designed to address the enduring effects of slavery and the systemic discrimination perpetuated under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements expanded to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language describing these efforts widened to incorporate “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
In corporations and government bodies, DEI initiatives primarily concentrated on recruitment strategies that positioned diversity as a financial benefit. Proponents contend that these programs tackle inequalities across different communities, although the primary focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The push for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter protests and escalating calls for social change. Walmart, for example, committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo hired its inaugural chief diversity officer, while firms like Google and Nike already had similar leadership positions established. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% filled by people of color, as reported by Bloomberg.
However, just as quickly as these initiatives expanded, a conservative backlash emerged.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, contends that DEI programs inherently separate individuals by racial and gender categories.
In recent times, critics have amplified claims that DEI efforts—initially intended to fight discrimination—are themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Training workshops that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
The foundation of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic concept positing that racism is intricately woven into American society. Gradually, efforts opposing CRT in education broadened into wider campaigns aiming to penalize “woke corporations.”
Social media accounts like End Wokeness and conservative figures such as Robby Starbuck have capitalized on this sentiment, targeting companies for their DEI initiatives. Starbuck has claimed responsibility for policy shifts at companies like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after exposing their DEI programs to his online followers.
One of the most prominent triumphs for this movement took place in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Demands to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, based on an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another significant juncture came in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decided that race could no longer be a consideration in university admissions, effectively overturning decades of affirmative action practices.
This verdict questioned the legality of corporate DEI policies. In the wake of the ruling, Meta notified its employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the discontinuation of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI programs by major corporations prompts questions about the genuineness of their pledges to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many firms initially adopted DEI efforts to “appear favorable” following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from a true dedication to change.
Nonetheless, not every company is succumbing to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation remarked that although DEI programs seem to be waning, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies still incorporate DEI commitments within their official statements. Moreover, Apple shareholders recently voted to uphold the company’s diversity efforts.
Public sentiment on DEI is split. A survey by JUST Capital indicates that backing for DEI has diminished, but support for related matters—such as equitable pay—remains robust. In parallel, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey discovered that a majority (56%) of working adults still perceive workplace DEI efforts as advantageous.
