As Japan nears its elections for the national upper house, a fresh issue has surfaced prominently in political discussions: the involvement and status of non-Japanese nationals within Japanese society. Traditionally known for its conservative views on immigration, this topic is now under intense examination and political debate. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has unveiled a government group designed to manage the intricate relationship between Japan’s citizens and its expanding foreign community.
A government initiative with strategic timing
The recently launched initiative, known officially as the Office for the Promotion of a Society of Harmonious Coexistence with Foreign Nationals, was announced just days before voters head to the polls. This timing is no coincidence. With populist sentiments gaining momentum and fringe parties using immigration as a central campaign theme, the government appears to be responding to growing public discourse centered on national identity and economic strain.
Prime Minister Ishiba described the office as a key point for managing policies that affect both residents and international individuals. While still developing, the task force is anticipated to supervise areas like immigration processes, property acquisitions by foreigners, and issues related to unpaid taxes or social insurance payments. The government has also considered implementing stricter regulations on medical debt, indicating that those with substantial healthcare liabilities might face visa denials or reentry restrictions.
This initiative is part of a broader effort to address what the administration describes as “inappropriate use” of government services by some foreign nationals. However, details about enforcement remain vague, leaving many to speculate about how such policies might affect Japan’s international relationships and its appeal as a destination for both skilled workers and tourists.
Surge in tourism and cultural tension
Despite the fact that foreigners account for only about 3% of Japan’s 120 million residents, the visible presence of international tourists and workers has grown significantly in recent years. In just the last decade, the population of foreign residents jumped from 2.2 million to nearly 3.8 million. The post-pandemic tourism boom has intensified this perception. In the first half of 2025 alone, over 21 million tourists visited the country, setting a new record.
This influx has led to visible tension in certain communities, particularly in tourist-heavy regions. Complaints from residents about overcrowding, disrespectful behavior, and strains on local resources have become increasingly common. In some areas, authorities have gone so far as to erect barriers to block popular photo spots, including a controversial screen placed to obscure views of Mount Fuji after local outcry over congestion and litter.
Even in areas renowned for their welcoming nature, like hot spring resorts, the increase in tourists has stirred worries among locals about the exhaustion of resources and the wear and tear on infrastructure. Moreover, some residents highlight the rising expenses of necessities such as rice and housing, which they blame—whether correctly or not—on international demand and economic influences from outside.
Jobs and public amenities under examination
Another issue emerging ahead of the election is the availability of public services and employment prospects. A number of Japanese residents believe that foreign employees are taking jobs at the expense of local job seekers or receiving an unfair share of social benefits. Despite these assertions frequently being based on personal stories, they are intensifying populist discourse that resonates with voters who feel neglected in a changing economic landscape.
A Tokyo retiree, speaking anonymously, expressed skepticism about the cultural compatibility of foreign workers, stating that differing traditions make coexistence difficult. Meanwhile, younger voices, like that of a 23-year-old office worker, echoed the belief that government support should prioritize citizens over non-nationals.
These opinions, although not necessarily backed by evidence, are gaining traction due to new political players. The Sanseito party, a conservative nationalist organization, has drawn notice with its agenda focusing on Japanese priorities. Even though they may not capture a dominant share, Sanseito has the potential to sway the power dynamics by appealing to disenchanted voters from major parties, such as the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).
Separating perception from reality
In the midst of the growing discussion, specialists warn that a significant portion of the ongoing dialogue is rooted more in perception than in actual realities. As per statistics from the Ministry of Justice, individuals from abroad constituted slightly over 5% of all arrests in 2023—covering both tourists and inhabitants. Moreover, Japan’s general crime rate has consistently dropped over the last twenty years, a pattern that goes against common fears about worsening public security.
Sociologists like Shunsuke Tanabe from Waseda University argue that increased visibility of foreigners has led to cognitive bias, causing some to mistakenly link demographic change with rising insecurity. He warns that such assumptions are easily exploited during election campaigns, especially in the digital age where misinformation spreads rapidly.
Tanabe also notes that social media has amplified divisive narratives, making it easier for parties with anti-immigration platforms to gain traction. The result is a political environment where symbolic gestures—like establishing a new office—may carry more weight than substantive policy solutions.
Political maneuvering with long-term consequences
The stakes for Prime Minister Ishiba and the LDP are high. After losing their majority in the lower house last year, another poor showing in the upper house vote could intensify internal pressure on Ishiba to resign. With Sanseito projected to secure several seats, every measure to retain public confidence becomes crucial.
Some political analysts believe the creation of the new task force is a strategic effort to seem attentive to voter issues while avoiding significant changes to the country’s immigration system. Jeffrey Hall, a lecturer specializing in Japanese studies at Kanda University, characterized the initiative as a strategic method to “express authority” on a delicate subject. Nevertheless, he cautioned that excessively strict monitoring or limitations on foreign nationals might have adverse economic repercussions.
“If Japan creates an environment where foreign workers feel unwelcome or unfairly targeted, it risks undermining its own labor force goals,” Hall said. “In a country where the working-age population is shrinking, the need for international talent is not optional—it’s essential.”
A demographic reality that can’t be ignored
Japan’s demographic crisis remains one of the most pressing issues facing its society and economy. The country’s birth rate dropped to a record low of 1.15 in 2024, far below the replacement rate of 2.1 needed to maintain population stability without immigration. With life expectancy among the highest in the world, the result is an aging society increasingly reliant on younger workers—many of whom must come from abroad.
To tackle worker shortages, Japan has been broadening its visa initiatives, specifically targeting “specialized skilled workers” in sectors such as healthcare, construction, hospitality, and aviation. By October 2024, the foreign workforce reached a record 2.3 million, highlighting continuous attempts to occupy critical positions that cannot be fulfilled by Japanese employees alone.
Ishiba recognized this reality during the introduction of the new team, emphasizing that Japan needs to stay accessible to international talent and tourism to ensure sustained growth over time. “To address the issues brought on by a decreasing birthrate and an aging population, we must incorporate the vitality of the world community,” he stated.
Looking ahead
As voting day approaches, Japan’s policies regarding foreign nationals will increasingly be influenced by the equilibrium between public opinion and economic needs. Even though issues related to cultural acceptance and resource allocation require careful consideration, specialists highlight the importance of policies based on data, avoiding impulsive actions motivated by populist anxiety.
Japan stands at a crossroads—caught between its traditions of cultural homogeneity and the imperatives of an interconnected world. Whether the new task force will evolve into a constructive force for integration or simply serve as an election-season symbol remains to be seen. Either way, the decisions made now will have profound implications for Japan’s future as both a global economic power and a multicultural society.
